Search - Theses Canada

 Error

Web Part Error: A Web Part or Web Form Control on this Page cannot be displayed or imported. The type Theses_Navigation.ThesesNav.ThesesNav, Theses_Navigation, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=a91be3c4567796d7 could not be found or it is not registered as safe. Correlation ID: 1f2559a0-7ee7-f0da-ff96-e4a47140c945.
OCLC number
394840984
Link(s) to full text
LAC copy
LAC copy
Author
Burns, John Conor,1969-
Title
Networking Ohio valley archaeology in the nineteenth century.
Degree
Ph. D. -- University of Toronto, 2006
Publisher
Ottawa :Library and Archives Canada = Bibliothè€que et Archives Canada,[2007]
Description
4 microfiches
Notes
Includes bibliographical references.
Abstract
In the nineteenth century, the Ohio valley contained dense concentrations of spectacular earthwork monuments and other sites attributed to the mysterious "moundbuilders." For North American ethnologists, positioning the moundbuilders within accounts of the pre-Columbian peopling of the New World was seen as a fundamental theoretical problem. At the same time, regions such as southern Ohio witnessed the accelerating dispersal and loss of archaeological data to development, agriculture, and increasing numbers of hobbyist archaeologists, relic-hunters, and others. This dissertation situates nineteenth century Ohio valley archaeology within a broader context of ethnological science. More importantly, it views the history of this archaeological work as a function of centralization. Efforts toward this goal became most pronounced in the 1880s through the involvement of the Smithsonian Institution's Bureau of Ethnology and the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology. Centralization was not at all a straightforward sort of process. It involved establishing complex networks of associations linking field spaces with institutional centers. Viewing Ohio valley archaeology in terms of centralization clarifies the effects of institutions such as the Smithsonian and the Peabody upon archaeological practice, and it allows for a broad understanding of the nature of fieldwork in the nineteenth century context. This perspective helps make sense of the actions of individuals within the networks, and it explains the sometimes intense inter-institutional competition underlying the Smithsonian and Peabody efforts. It also suggests that the production of archaeological knowledge cannot be disentangled from the networks facilitating centralization.
ISBN
9780494218952
0494218959
Date modified: